<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (9) TMI 14 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6310</link>
    <description>The inference whether unexplained cash credits constituted income from undisclosed sources or capital receipts depended on appreciation of proved facts, so it was treated as a finding of fact rather than a question of law. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the cash credits were not assessable as income, despite the explanation being found false, was therefore within its fact-finding jurisdiction. On that basis, no referable question of law arose and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the refusal to refer the questions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (9) TMI 14 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6310</link>
      <description>The inference whether unexplained cash credits constituted income from undisclosed sources or capital receipts depended on appreciation of proved facts, so it was treated as a finding of fact rather than a question of law. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the cash credits were not assessable as income, despite the explanation being found false, was therefore within its fact-finding jurisdiction. On that basis, no referable question of law arose and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the refusal to refer the questions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>