<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 162 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the original refund claim filed in 2002 was within the prescribed time limit under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The rejection of the claim as time-barred in 2005 was deemed unreasonable, as other issues like merit or unjust enrichment were not addressed. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal, instructing the adjudicating authority to consider the demand case&#039;s status and provide a personal hearing to the appellant. The authority was directed to resolve the matter within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 162 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the original refund claim filed in 2002 was within the prescribed time limit under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The rejection of the claim as time-barred in 2005 was deemed unreasonable, as other issues like merit or unjust enrichment were not addressed. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal, instructing the adjudicating authority to consider the demand case&#039;s status and provide a personal hearing to the appellant. The authority was directed to resolve the matter within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>