<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 161 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337081</link>
    <description>Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 applies only where inputs or capital goods on which credit has been taken are removed as such from the factory. Where the goods were admittedly used capital goods and only worn-out parts were cleared, the statutory condition of removal as such was not met. Accordingly, duty could not be demanded under Rule 3(4), and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 161 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337081</link>
      <description>Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 applies only where inputs or capital goods on which credit has been taken are removed as such from the factory. Where the goods were admittedly used capital goods and only worn-out parts were cleared, the statutory condition of removal as such was not met. Accordingly, duty could not be demanded under Rule 3(4), and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>