<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 152 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the statutory obligation of providing canteen facilities to employees and the established nexus between the canteen service and the manufacturing activities. The judgments cited by the respondent supported the assessee&#039;s position, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:52:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 152 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the statutory obligation of providing canteen facilities to employees and the established nexus between the canteen service and the manufacturing activities. The judgments cited by the respondent supported the assessee&#039;s position, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>