<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 151 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337071</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE allowed the appeal by the 100% EOU manufacturing processed food, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim on Insurance Service. The Tribunal held that the product liability insurance qualifies as an &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 151 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337071</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE allowed the appeal by the 100% EOU manufacturing processed food, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim on Insurance Service. The Tribunal held that the product liability insurance qualifies as an &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>