<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 149 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit on goods similar to those manufactured by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the cenvat credit had already been reversed upon clearance of the goods, resulting in a revenue-neutral situation. As such, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment was delivered on 29/11/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:52:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 149 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit on goods similar to those manufactured by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the cenvat credit had already been reversed upon clearance of the goods, resulting in a revenue-neutral situation. As such, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment was delivered on 29/11/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>