https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189252 Section 35 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 deems a pre-existing sanctioned development plan to be a final development plan, so later land-use changes must be tested against the scheme for final plans and minor modifications. A change from playground to school and cultural centre was treated as a valid minor modification under Section 37(2), while the 1992 notification was treated as sanction of a draft development plan under Section 31(1). A notification is not invalid merely because it cites the wrong provision if the substantive power exists, and the land-use decision was not found arbitrary. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:43:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189252 Section 35 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 deems a pre-existing sanctioned development plan to be a final development plan, so later land-use changes must be tested against the scheme for final plans and minor modifications. A change from playground to school and cultural centre was treated as a valid minor modification under Section 37(2), while the 1992 notification was treated as sanction of a draft development plan under Section 31(1). A notification is not invalid merely because it cites the wrong provision if the substantive power exists, and the land-use decision was not found arbitrary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189252