<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1125 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189252</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court examined the legality of a notification modifying land use from &quot;school and cultural center&quot; to &quot;playground&quot; under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Court found the notification valid, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Court clarified the nature of a previous notification earmarking the land for specific use, emphasizing it was a minor modification under a different section of the Act. The Supreme Court criticized the High Court&#039;s interpretation of the notifications and relevant sections, ultimately allowing the appeal, upholding the legality of the 1992 notification, and dismissing a contempt petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1125 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189252</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court examined the legality of a notification modifying land use from &quot;school and cultural center&quot; to &quot;playground&quot; under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Court found the notification valid, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Court clarified the nature of a previous notification earmarking the land for specific use, emphasizing it was a minor modification under a different section of the Act. The Supreme Court criticized the High Court&#039;s interpretation of the notifications and relevant sections, ultimately allowing the appeal, upholding the legality of the 1992 notification, and dismissing a contempt petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>