https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337057 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the communication regarding the disposal of seized gold bars without an adjudication order to be erroneous. The court ordered the release of the goods due to the prolonged delay in adjudication proceedings, quashing the communication and allowing for adjudication within four weeks. The release of the gold bars was permitted upon furnishing a bank guarantee for 50% of the value and a personal bond for the remaining amount. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337057 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the communication regarding the disposal of seized gold bars without an adjudication order to be erroneous. The court ordered the release of the goods due to the prolonged delay in adjudication proceedings, quashing the communication and allowing for adjudication within four weeks. The release of the gold bars was permitted upon furnishing a bank guarantee for 50% of the value and a personal bond for the remaining amount. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337057