<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 136 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337056</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of Anti-dumping duty on Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) imports into India from specific countries, rejecting challenges against the exclusion of a domestic industry player, conducting cumulative investigations, alleged violations of natural justice, injury analysis based on data from a sick company, and requests for separate assessments. The tribunal supported the designated authority&#039;s decisions based on Anti Dumping Rules, emphasizing the need for reasonable exclusion criteria and collective injury evaluation. Appeals were dismissed due to lack of factual or legal grounds, and miscellaneous applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 136 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337056</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of Anti-dumping duty on Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) imports into India from specific countries, rejecting challenges against the exclusion of a domestic industry player, conducting cumulative investigations, alleged violations of natural justice, injury analysis based on data from a sick company, and requests for separate assessments. The tribunal supported the designated authority&#039;s decisions based on Anti Dumping Rules, emphasizing the need for reasonable exclusion criteria and collective injury evaluation. Appeals were dismissed due to lack of factual or legal grounds, and miscellaneous applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>