<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 135 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, ruling that the appellant, a government undertaking managing Inland Containers Depots (ICDs), was liable to pay cost recovery charges for customs officers&#039; deployment at ICDs in Rajasthan. The Tribunal found the appellant failed to comply with regulations, leading to penalties, and emphasized the appellant&#039;s obligation as a custodian under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, highlighting the appellant&#039;s lack of diligence in meeting statutory obligations and affirmed the recovery of cost charges as mandated by the Regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 135 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, ruling that the appellant, a government undertaking managing Inland Containers Depots (ICDs), was liable to pay cost recovery charges for customs officers&#039; deployment at ICDs in Rajasthan. The Tribunal found the appellant failed to comply with regulations, leading to penalties, and emphasized the appellant&#039;s obligation as a custodian under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, highlighting the appellant&#039;s lack of diligence in meeting statutory obligations and affirmed the recovery of cost charges as mandated by the Regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>