<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 134 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Assessee, setting aside the impugned orders, and dismissed the appeals filed by the department. It was held that the Customs authorities of Visakhapatnam lacked jurisdiction, the fishing trawlers were foreign-going vessels eligible for duty-free stores under Section 87, and the demands were time-barred due to the Assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and proper permissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 134 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Assessee, setting aside the impugned orders, and dismissed the appeals filed by the department. It was held that the Customs authorities of Visakhapatnam lacked jurisdiction, the fishing trawlers were foreign-going vessels eligible for duty-free stores under Section 87, and the demands were time-barred due to the Assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and proper permissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>