<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 124 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337044</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred against the 10.03.2015 order due to exceeding the 120-day limit under Section 10-F of the Companies Act 1956. The application under Section 151/152 CPC was rightly rejected as the Board lacked the power to review its orders. The Court highlighted the statutory time limit for appeals and the limitations on the Board&#039;s authority to review its decisions, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:50:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 124 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337044</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred against the 10.03.2015 order due to exceeding the 120-day limit under Section 10-F of the Companies Act 1956. The application under Section 151/152 CPC was rightly rejected as the Board lacked the power to review its orders. The Court highlighted the statutory time limit for appeals and the limitations on the Board&#039;s authority to review its decisions, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>