https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337044 A special appeal period under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as an outer limit of 120 days, and the Limitation Act could not extend it; the later application did not attract merger, so the appeal against the Company Law Board order was time-barred. The Company Law Board's inherent and amendment powers under Regulations 44, 45 and 46 were confined to preventing abuse of process, correcting accidental slips, or curing procedural defects, and did not include a power to review or reconsider a concluded order on merits after deletion of the earlier review provision. The challenged orders were therefore left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:50:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337044 A special appeal period under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as an outer limit of 120 days, and the Limitation Act could not extend it; the later application did not attract merger, so the appeal against the Company Law Board order was time-barred. The Company Law Board's inherent and amendment powers under Regulations 44, 45 and 46 were confined to preventing abuse of process, correcting accidental slips, or curing procedural defects, and did not include a power to review or reconsider a concluded order on merits after deletion of the earlier review provision. The challenged orders were therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337044