<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189239</link>
    <description>The court quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the invalidity of the notice issued under section 148 and deleted the addition of Rs. 2,21,200 on the merits. Both appeals were allowed, emphasizing the necessity of proper procedural adherence and the requirement for concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 17:52:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189239</link>
      <description>The court quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the invalidity of the notice issued under section 148 and deleted the addition of Rs. 2,21,200 on the merits. Both appeals were allowed, emphasizing the necessity of proper procedural adherence and the requirement for concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>