<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 568 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189237</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act could not be sustained where the assessee had disclosed all primary and material facts during the original assessment. On the record, the assessee had placed all relevant materials before the assessing officer, so there was no failure to disclose facts necessary for assessment. In that situation, the statutory basis for reopening was absent, and the reassessment proceedings were held unsustainable in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 17:38:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 568 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189237</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act could not be sustained where the assessee had disclosed all primary and material facts during the original assessment. On the record, the assessee had placed all relevant materials before the assessing officer, so there was no failure to disclose facts necessary for assessment. In that situation, the statutory basis for reopening was absent, and the reassessment proceedings were held unsustainable in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>