<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 29 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6302</link>
    <description>Shares acquired and retained for about 14 years, recorded in the accounts as investments and not sold despite earlier price rises, were treated as investment assets rather than stock-in-trade. On those proved facts, the Tribunal drew a reasonable inference that the loss on sale was capital in nature, not a trading loss, and that mixed question of law and fact was upheld against the assessee. The assessee&#039;s claim to revenue treatment therefore failed, and the characterisation of the loss as capital loss was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 29 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6302</link>
      <description>Shares acquired and retained for about 14 years, recorded in the accounts as investments and not sold despite earlier price rises, were treated as investment assets rather than stock-in-trade. On those proved facts, the Tribunal drew a reasonable inference that the loss on sale was capital in nature, not a trading loss, and that mixed question of law and fact was upheld against the assessee. The assessee&#039;s claim to revenue treatment therefore failed, and the characterisation of the loss as capital loss was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>