<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 106 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337026</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income derived from lease rentals should be classified as business income rather than income from house property. The ITAT allowed depreciation and other business expenses, citing the main objective of the assessee to lease out the property for rental income. The rescindment of approval for deduction under section 80IA did not change the nature of the activities, leading to the classification of income as business income. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, while those by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 106 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337026</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income derived from lease rentals should be classified as business income rather than income from house property. The ITAT allowed depreciation and other business expenses, citing the main objective of the assessee to lease out the property for rental income. The rescindment of approval for deduction under section 80IA did not change the nature of the activities, leading to the classification of income as business income. The appeals by the assessee were allowed, while those by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>