<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 105 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337025</link>
    <description>Interest on overdraft borrowings was held not deductible where the borrowed funds were directly routed as interest-free advances to a related party for non-business purposes. The factual inquiry established a clear nexus between the interest-bearing borrowing and the advance, and the available interest-free capital could not be relied on because it had already been deployed; exempt income from a different period also did not alter that result. The presumption that interest-free funds were used was therefore unavailable once direct utilisation of borrowed funds was shown, and the related interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 105 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337025</link>
      <description>Interest on overdraft borrowings was held not deductible where the borrowed funds were directly routed as interest-free advances to a related party for non-business purposes. The factual inquiry established a clear nexus between the interest-bearing borrowing and the advance, and the available interest-free capital could not be relied on because it had already been deployed; exempt income from a different period also did not alter that result. The presumption that interest-free funds were used was therefore unavailable once direct utilisation of borrowed funds was shown, and the related interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>