<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 101 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337021</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against a service tax demand for Renting of Immovable Property Services. The appellants, co-owners of a jointly rented property, demonstrated individual ownership shares and rental receipts below the exemption limit. The Tribunal held that co-owners cannot be jointly liable for service tax, upholding the benefit of Notification No. 06/2005-ST. Consequently, the demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable, and the appellants&#039; appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The judgment emphasizes the importance of individual ownership shares in determining service tax liability on jointly rented properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 101 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337021</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in an appeal against a service tax demand for Renting of Immovable Property Services. The appellants, co-owners of a jointly rented property, demonstrated individual ownership shares and rental receipts below the exemption limit. The Tribunal held that co-owners cannot be jointly liable for service tax, upholding the benefit of Notification No. 06/2005-ST. Consequently, the demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable, and the appellants&#039; appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The judgment emphasizes the importance of individual ownership shares in determining service tax liability on jointly rented properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>