<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 100 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337020</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposed by the authorities for alleged evasion of Service Tax due to deliberate suppression of information by the appellants, despite their plea for reduced penalty under Section 11AC being supported by relevant judgments. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of cooperation during investigations and the inability to extend the benefit of reduced penalty based on legal precedents and interpretations of relevant judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 100 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337020</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposed by the authorities for alleged evasion of Service Tax due to deliberate suppression of information by the appellants, despite their plea for reduced penalty under Section 11AC being supported by relevant judgments. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of cooperation during investigations and the inability to extend the benefit of reduced penalty based on legal precedents and interpretations of relevant judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>