<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability on lease rental charges and fleet management fees, restricted the demand to the normal period, and allowed abatement upon verification of conditions. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability on lease rental charges and fleet management fees, restricted the demand to the normal period, and allowed abatement upon verification of conditions. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>