<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 97 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner(Appeals) granting a refund to the respondents, a 100% EOU, for service tax paid on input services. The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s challenge, emphasizing the eligibility of EOUs for Cenvat credit on input services used in manufacturing goods for export. Relying on relevant case laws and statutory provisions, the Tribunal affirmed the legislative intent to provide relief on taxes paid on exports, supporting the respondents&#039; entitlement to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 97 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner(Appeals) granting a refund to the respondents, a 100% EOU, for service tax paid on input services. The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s challenge, emphasizing the eligibility of EOUs for Cenvat credit on input services used in manufacturing goods for export. Relying on relevant case laws and statutory provisions, the Tribunal affirmed the legislative intent to provide relief on taxes paid on exports, supporting the respondents&#039; entitlement to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>