<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 86 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337006</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that MS items used for fabrication of capital goods are eligible for Cenvat credit. The show cause notice invoking the extended period of limitation was deemed invalid as there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, making the demand time-barred. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand and providing consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:00:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 86 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337006</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that MS items used for fabrication of capital goods are eligible for Cenvat credit. The show cause notice invoking the extended period of limitation was deemed invalid as there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, making the demand time-barred. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand and providing consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>