https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337000 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant for the refund claim, setting aside the rejection by the Central Excise Department. The decision was based on the admissibility of Cenvat credit on goods used in jobwork activity, concluding that the appellant's reversal of credit on paints used in jobwork was done under protest and therefore the refund claim was valid. The Tribunal emphasized that amounts paid under protest are eligible for refund, supported by a certificate from a Chartered Accountant, and granted consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 08:57:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337000 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant for the refund claim, setting aside the rejection by the Central Excise Department. The decision was based on the admissibility of Cenvat credit on goods used in jobwork activity, concluding that the appellant's reversal of credit on paints used in jobwork was done under protest and therefore the refund claim was valid. The Tribunal emphasized that amounts paid under protest are eligible for refund, supported by a certificate from a Chartered Accountant, and granted consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337000