https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336997 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of cenvat credit on steel items as inputs for manufacturing. The Tribunal held that the disputed goods were indeed inputs used in the manufacture of the final product, relying on legal precedents and noting that the amended definition of 'input' post-July 2009 did not apply to the period in question. Consequently, the impugned order was found to have no merit, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellant with consequential benefits awarded according to the law. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 08:57:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336997 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of cenvat credit on steel items as inputs for manufacturing. The Tribunal held that the disputed goods were indeed inputs used in the manufacture of the final product, relying on legal precedents and noting that the amended definition of 'input' post-July 2009 did not apply to the period in question. Consequently, the impugned order was found to have no merit, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellant with consequential benefits awarded according to the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336997