https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336993 The judgment favored the appellant-importer, holding that the additional evidence should have been considered by the Commissioner of Appeals and the Tribunal. The orders denying the refund claim were set aside, and the matter was remitted back for fresh consideration. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336993 The judgment favored the appellant-importer, holding that the additional evidence should have been considered by the Commissioner of Appeals and the Tribunal. The orders denying the refund claim were set aside, and the matter was remitted back for fresh consideration. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336993