https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336990 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's decision to impose Anti Dumping Duty on vitrified tiles imported from China PR, rejecting the appellant's challenge. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's data submissions for the new shipper review and noted the lack of satisfactory responses to verification requests. Despite the appellant's arguments regarding China's market economy status and the adequacy of the verification visit, the Tribunal upheld the imposition of Anti Dumping duty at &8377;155/- per sq. mtr, as determined by the DA. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336990 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's decision to impose Anti Dumping Duty on vitrified tiles imported from China PR, rejecting the appellant's challenge. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's data submissions for the new shipper review and noted the lack of satisfactory responses to verification requests. Despite the appellant's arguments regarding China's market economy status and the adequacy of the verification visit, the Tribunal upheld the imposition of Anti Dumping duty at &8377;155/- per sq. mtr, as determined by the DA. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336990