<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 68 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the prohibition order appealable under Regulation 21 of CBLR, 2013. The Tribunal held that the prohibition order was unsustainable due to the failure to initiate and complete enquiry proceedings within the stipulated nine months, setting aside the order on 21.06.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 08:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 68 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the prohibition order appealable under Regulation 21 of CBLR, 2013. The Tribunal held that the prohibition order was unsustainable due to the failure to initiate and complete enquiry proceedings within the stipulated nine months, setting aside the order on 21.06.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>