https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336985 The High Court upheld the decision of the Tax Board, ruling against the petitioner in a case involving suspected tax evasion through transit sale of goods. The court emphasized the lack of concrete evidence supporting the transit sale claim, noting procedural requirements under the CST Act were not met. Legal precedents were cited to underscore the necessity of substantial proof for transit sales. The dismissal of the petition was based on the insufficiency of evidence to validate the transit sale claim, affirming the lower authorities' findings on the matter. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 08:36:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336985 The High Court upheld the decision of the Tax Board, ruling against the petitioner in a case involving suspected tax evasion through transit sale of goods. The court emphasized the lack of concrete evidence supporting the transit sale claim, noting procedural requirements under the CST Act were not met. Legal precedents were cited to underscore the necessity of substantial proof for transit sales. The dismissal of the petition was based on the insufficiency of evidence to validate the transit sale claim, affirming the lower authorities' findings on the matter. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336985