https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336982 The court issued non-bailable warrants in Company Application No. 24/2004 to secure the appearance of a respondent evading service for 12 years under Section 454 (5) of the Companies Act of 1956. Mr. Rahul Agarwal's name was erroneously listed in the application, leading to its removal from the cause list. In Company Application No. 51/2010, respondents were deleted due to insufficient evidence supporting the case against them, as revealed by discrepancies in the chartered accountant's report. The Rajasthan High Court granted the removal of respondent Nos. 4, 9, 11, 12, and 16 from the application under Section 543 of the Companies Act 1956. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 08:32:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336982 The court issued non-bailable warrants in Company Application No. 24/2004 to secure the appearance of a respondent evading service for 12 years under Section 454 (5) of the Companies Act of 1956. Mr. Rahul Agarwal's name was erroneously listed in the application, leading to its removal from the cause list. In Company Application No. 51/2010, respondents were deleted due to insufficient evidence supporting the case against them, as revealed by discrepancies in the chartered accountant's report. The Rajasthan High Court granted the removal of respondent Nos. 4, 9, 11, 12, and 16 from the application under Section 543 of the Companies Act 1956. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336982