<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 61 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336981</link>
    <description>The petition was dismissed as barred by limitation. The Tribunal concluded that the petitioner&#039;s delay in filing the petition, lack of locus standi, and failure to meet shareholding requirements under the Companies Act led to the dismissal. However, the petitioner was granted the right to claim unclaimed dividends. Each party was directed to bear their own costs due to the petitioner&#039;s personal difficulties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 61 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336981</link>
      <description>The petition was dismissed as barred by limitation. The Tribunal concluded that the petitioner&#039;s delay in filing the petition, lack of locus standi, and failure to meet shareholding requirements under the Companies Act led to the dismissal. However, the petitioner was granted the right to claim unclaimed dividends. Each party was directed to bear their own costs due to the petitioner&#039;s personal difficulties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>