https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336980 Registrar failed to comply with the mandatory notice and service procedure required before striking a company from the register under Section 560(1)-(2); the prescribed inquiry letter, registered-post follow-up and prior gazette publication sequence were not observed, rendering the strike-off procedurally defective. Because the statutory preconditions for exercising the registrar's power were unmet, the appropriate remedial consequence is restoration of the company's name to the register and setting aside of the impugned gazette notification; restoration may be granted subject to imposition of costs for the delay. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 08:32:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336980 Registrar failed to comply with the mandatory notice and service procedure required before striking a company from the register under Section 560(1)-(2); the prescribed inquiry letter, registered-post follow-up and prior gazette publication sequence were not observed, rendering the strike-off procedurally defective. Because the statutory preconditions for exercising the registrar's power were unmet, the appropriate remedial consequence is restoration of the company's name to the register and setting aside of the impugned gazette notification; restoration may be granted subject to imposition of costs for the delay. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336980