<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 55 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336975</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that disallowance of interest payments under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was not warranted as the payments to related parties were not excessive or unreasonable compared to market rates. The tribunal emphasized that paying different rates to related and non-related parties did not render the payments excessive, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer towards disallowance of interest for related parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 55 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336975</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that disallowance of interest payments under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was not warranted as the payments to related parties were not excessive or unreasonable compared to market rates. The tribunal emphasized that paying different rates to related and non-related parties did not render the payments excessive, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer towards disallowance of interest for related parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>