<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 43 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld CIT(A) to delete the interest charged u/s.234B for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal found the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Jurisdictional High Court binding, ruling that interest can only be charged on the income declared in the return, not on the assessed income. The dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s review petition by the Hon&#039;ble Jharkhand High Court further supported the validity of the ld CIT(A)&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 43 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld CIT(A) to delete the interest charged u/s.234B for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal found the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Jurisdictional High Court binding, ruling that interest can only be charged on the income declared in the return, not on the assessed income. The dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s review petition by the Hon&#039;ble Jharkhand High Court further supported the validity of the ld CIT(A)&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>