<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 41 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order as penalty proceedings were not validly initiated in the assessment order dated 22-12-2009, and the original assessment order dated 30-12-2008 had abated. The decision stressed the need for clear initiation of penalty proceedings in the assessment order, in line with judicial precedents. The penalty order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 41 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order as penalty proceedings were not validly initiated in the assessment order dated 22-12-2009, and the original assessment order dated 30-12-2008 had abated. The decision stressed the need for clear initiation of penalty proceedings in the assessment order, in line with judicial precedents. The penalty order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>