<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 37 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous order and granting relief. The judgment clarified that coaching in English language can qualify as vocational training under Notification No.24/2004-ST, emphasizing the importance of vocational training criteria and the impact of subsequent amendments on exemption eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 37 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous order and granting relief. The judgment clarified that coaching in English language can qualify as vocational training under Notification No.24/2004-ST, emphasizing the importance of vocational training criteria and the impact of subsequent amendments on exemption eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>