<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 34 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336954</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for reassessment of the refund eligibility for interest on service tax paid, as the liability issue was settled in favor of the appellant. The impugned order was set aside, allowing for a fresh consideration of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 34 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336954</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for reassessment of the refund eligibility for interest on service tax paid, as the liability issue was settled in favor of the appellant. The impugned order was set aside, allowing for a fresh consideration of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>