<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 30 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336950</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals) to reject the appeals of the appellants regarding fraudulent Cenvat credit availed based on fake invoices. The Tribunal found similarities in the modus operandi of the appellants and other cases where demands were confirmed, concluding that the invoices were fake. The plea of violation of natural justice was dismissed. The appellants&#039; appeals were dismissed, affirming the Order-in-Original for recovery of Cenvat credit, interest, and penalties, including personal penalties on directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 13:46:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 30 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336950</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals) to reject the appeals of the appellants regarding fraudulent Cenvat credit availed based on fake invoices. The Tribunal found similarities in the modus operandi of the appellants and other cases where demands were confirmed, concluding that the invoices were fake. The plea of violation of natural justice was dismissed. The appellants&#039; appeals were dismissed, affirming the Order-in-Original for recovery of Cenvat credit, interest, and penalties, including personal penalties on directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>