<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 15 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336935</link>
    <description>Unutilised Cenvat credit attributable to exports cannot be denied refund under Rule 5 of the Central Excise Rules, 2004 merely because the assessee had domestic clearances or had not first exhausted the credit against such clearances. The Tribunal noted that Circular No. 120/01/2010-ST supports refund where export-related credit remains unutilised, and accepted that Rule 5 does not require a strict one-to-one correlation between input credit and exported goods. On that basis, the refund claim was held allowable and the contrary rejection was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 15 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336935</link>
      <description>Unutilised Cenvat credit attributable to exports cannot be denied refund under Rule 5 of the Central Excise Rules, 2004 merely because the assessee had domestic clearances or had not first exhausted the credit against such clearances. The Tribunal noted that Circular No. 120/01/2010-ST supports refund where export-related credit remains unutilised, and accepted that Rule 5 does not require a strict one-to-one correlation between input credit and exported goods. On that basis, the refund claim was held allowable and the contrary rejection was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>