<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 12 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336932</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit depended on establishing a proper correlation between the HR/CR coils described in the dealer&#039;s invoice and the HR/CR sheets actually received after cutting. The record showed that the appellant had not produced the specific linkage directed in the earlier remand, as the material submitted related only to sheets and the components made from them. Because that correlation remained unverified, the matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for denovo adjudication, giving the appellant one further opportunity to establish the required nexus. Credit could be allowed only if the appellant proves the invoice-to-receipt correlation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 13:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 12 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336932</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit depended on establishing a proper correlation between the HR/CR coils described in the dealer&#039;s invoice and the HR/CR sheets actually received after cutting. The record showed that the appellant had not produced the specific linkage directed in the earlier remand, as the material submitted related only to sheets and the components made from them. Because that correlation remained unverified, the matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for denovo adjudication, giving the appellant one further opportunity to establish the required nexus. Credit could be allowed only if the appellant proves the invoice-to-receipt correlation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>