<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 12 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for compliance with the direction to establish correlation between the goods received and those described in the invoices for the allowance of Cenvat Credit. The appellant was given another opportunity to provide the required correlation to satisfy the adjudicating authority, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and a remand for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 13:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 12 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for compliance with the direction to establish correlation between the goods received and those described in the invoices for the allowance of Cenvat Credit. The appellant was given another opportunity to provide the required correlation to satisfy the adjudicating authority, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and a remand for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>