<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 11 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the final assessment of shipping bills under the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the appellant&#039;s challenge. It affirmed that the duty calculation should be based on the declared value at the time of export, despite subsequent sale to a different purchaser at a lower price due to lower Fe content. The Tribunal emphasized that the valuation for customs duty purposes remains fixed at the time of export clearance, dismissing the appeals as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 11 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the final assessment of shipping bills under the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the appellant&#039;s challenge. It affirmed that the duty calculation should be based on the declared value at the time of export, despite subsequent sale to a different purchaser at a lower price due to lower Fe content. The Tribunal emphasized that the valuation for customs duty purposes remains fixed at the time of export clearance, dismissing the appeals as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>