<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Confiscation of Wristwatches Due to Supplier&#039;s Absence and Appellant&#039;s Failure to Prove Legitimacy.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32625</link>
    <description>Foreign brand wrist watches - when the supplier is not existing at the address given in the invoice then there is no need to go into other documents - since the appellant could not discharge the burden that the goods seized is other than the smuggled goods, the goods have been rightly confiscated absolutely, which is upheld. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:40:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Confiscation of Wristwatches Due to Supplier&#039;s Absence and Appellant&#039;s Failure to Prove Legitimacy.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32625</link>
      <description>Foreign brand wrist watches - when the supplier is not existing at the address given in the invoice then there is no need to go into other documents - since the appellant could not discharge the burden that the goods seized is other than the smuggled goods, the goods have been rightly confiscated absolutely, which is upheld. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:40:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>