<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 5 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336925</link>
    <description>The appeal was directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 40/2005-MCH passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Custom House, Mumbai-I. The Ld. Commissioner set aside the original authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai found the impugned order to be cryptic and lacking direction, setting it aside and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:40:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 5 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336925</link>
      <description>The appeal was directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 40/2005-MCH passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Custom House, Mumbai-I. The Ld. Commissioner set aside the original authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai found the impugned order to be cryptic and lacking direction, setting it aside and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>