<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 602 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189213</link>
    <description>The court held that the former director cannot be held liable for the trade tax dues of the company as he had resigned and did not possess any assets of the company. The circular issued by the trade tax commissioner targeting the director was found to be in violation of the Trade Tax Act. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the circular, and permitted recovery against the company for the outstanding dues, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 602 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189213</link>
      <description>The court held that the former director cannot be held liable for the trade tax dues of the company as he had resigned and did not possess any assets of the company. The circular issued by the trade tax commissioner targeting the director was found to be in violation of the Trade Tax Act. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the circular, and permitted recovery against the company for the outstanding dues, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>