<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 292 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189212</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the decision of the High Court in the Letters Patent Appeal, and restored the decision of the learned Single Judge. The procedural errors and misinterpretations by the lower courts were corrected, emphasizing that the appeal from the order was competent and should be considered on its merits. The case was remitted back to the first appellate court for a fresh hearing on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 292 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189212</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the decision of the High Court in the Letters Patent Appeal, and restored the decision of the learned Single Judge. The procedural errors and misinterpretations by the lower courts were corrected, emphasizing that the appeal from the order was competent and should be considered on its merits. The case was remitted back to the first appellate court for a fresh hearing on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>