https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189211 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, ruling it acted unlawfully by formulating new substantial questions of law without notice and improperly reappreciating evidence, exceeding its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC. The judgment of the lower appellate court in A.S. No. 21 of 1983, Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, was restored. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189211 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, ruling it acted unlawfully by formulating new substantial questions of law without notice and improperly reappreciating evidence, exceeding its jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC. The judgment of the lower appellate court in A.S. No. 21 of 1983, Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, was restored. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189211