https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189210 The Supreme Court clarified that the undertaking to stay execution of an eviction decree was limited to the trial court's decision on a specific performance suit. As the suit was dismissed with only a partial review granted, the respondents could not resist eviction based on the reopened suit. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's decision, allowing the appellant to proceed with eviction. The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were directed to vacate the premises without costs awarded. en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:45:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189210 The Supreme Court clarified that the undertaking to stay execution of an eviction decree was limited to the trial court's decision on a specific performance suit. As the suit was dismissed with only a partial review granted, the respondents could not resist eviction based on the reopened suit. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's decision, allowing the appellant to proceed with eviction. The appeal was allowed, and the respondents were directed to vacate the premises without costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189210