<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 418 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189208</link>
    <description>Sales tax recovery for a private limited company&#039;s assessed liability must be confined to the company&#039;s assets. Because the assessment order and recovery certificate were issued against the company, there was no legal basis to enforce recovery against the private assets of its directors merely by reason of their office. At the same time, no ground was found to restrain recovery from the company&#039;s own assets, so the recovery proceedings could continue against those assets. The petition therefore succeeded only to protect the directors&#039; personal property, while leaving recovery of the assessed dues against the company unaffected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 418 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189208</link>
      <description>Sales tax recovery for a private limited company&#039;s assessed liability must be confined to the company&#039;s assets. Because the assessment order and recovery certificate were issued against the company, there was no legal basis to enforce recovery against the private assets of its directors merely by reason of their office. At the same time, no ground was found to restrain recovery from the company&#039;s own assets, so the recovery proceedings could continue against those assets. The petition therefore succeeded only to protect the directors&#039; personal property, while leaving recovery of the assessed dues against the company unaffected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>