<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 311 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189201</link>
    <description>Receipts from satellite transmission services were treated as not taxable in India as royalty or otherwise under section 9(1)(vi), section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12 of the India-US treaty, because the relevant year involved identical facts already covered by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order and the Delhi High Court ruling in Asia Satellite Telecommunications. Applying section 90(2), the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the more beneficial treaty position. The revenue&#039;s reliance on the assessment order did not displace the binding effect of the earlier decision, and the departmental appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 311 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189201</link>
      <description>Receipts from satellite transmission services were treated as not taxable in India as royalty or otherwise under section 9(1)(vi), section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12 of the India-US treaty, because the relevant year involved identical facts already covered by the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order and the Delhi High Court ruling in Asia Satellite Telecommunications. Applying section 90(2), the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the more beneficial treaty position. The revenue&#039;s reliance on the assessment order did not displace the binding effect of the earlier decision, and the departmental appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>