<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the treatment of the assessee as an investor in shares. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in the treatment of the assessee and concluded that the CIT(A) erred in bifurcating the investment based on the holding period. The judgment was pronounced on 24/09/2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1081 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the treatment of the assessee as an investor in shares. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in the treatment of the assessee and concluded that the CIT(A) erred in bifurcating the investment based on the holding period. The judgment was pronounced on 24/09/2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>