<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1559 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336914</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the security deposits should be treated as capital receipts and not as income. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1559 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336914</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the security deposits should be treated as capital receipts and not as income. The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>